4.1 Article

Spatial and temporal variability of algal community dynamics and productivity in floodplain wetlands along the Tanana River, Alaska

Journal

FRESHWATER SCIENCE
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages 765-777

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/676939

Keywords

algae; boreal; climate change; primary production; taxonomic composition; wetland

Funding

  1. Wetland Foundation
  2. Phycological Society of America
  3. Graduate School at MSU
  4. National Science Foundation [DEB-0425328, DEB-0080609]
  5. Bonanza Creek Long-Term Ecological Research program [PNW01-JV11261952-231]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The boreal landscape is a mosaic of wetlands with distinct ecosystem properties. Algae are important for wetland functioning, but relatively little is known about the structure of algal communities among boreal wetlands. We documented spatial and temporal variability of algal community dynamics and productivity during a growing season in 6 wetlands (1 rich and 1 poor fen, 1 tussock, and 3 riverine marshes) in interior Alaska. Algal biomass and productivity were greater in the poor fen and a riverine marsh than in all other wetlands. Water depth and nutrients were significant predictors of benthic algal biomass and productivity among wetlands and were greatest immediately after the spring thaw and decreased during the growing season. Water depth and nutrients (N and P) explained the most variability in algal community structure. Algal community structure differed among wetlands, and temporal variation in environmental conditions was a significant predictor of the relative abundance of algal genera in individual wetlands. N-2-fixing cyanobacteria increased in abundance with a seasonal decline in water depth and nutrient concentrations. Our characterization of algal community dynamics and productivity in relation to environmental characteristics will help to forecast future wetland function in a changing boreal landscape.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available