4.1 Article

Riffle topography and water flow support high invertebrate biomass in a gravel-bed river

Journal

FRESHWATER SCIENCE
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages 706-718

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1899/12-080.1

Keywords

gravel-bed rivers; riffles; bed topography; invertebrate biomass; bed stability; hydraulic simulations

Funding

  1. Chikuma River Office in the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism
  2. Josho and Koshoku fisheries

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We compared biomass and community structure of macroinvertebrates among 3 flow zones (deep, rapid, flat) of riffles at 3 sites in a gravel-bed river. We evaluated bed stability in these zones with a 2-dimensional hydrodynamic simulation over a range of discharge levels. Deep zones had higher flow velocity and coarser bed materials than other zones. Rapid zones were shallower with higher flow velocity than flat zones. The probability of bed movement was greatest in rapid zones and was lowest in deep zones based on bed shear stress and the size of bed materials. Total macroinvertebrate biomass was dominated by filterer insects and was highest in deep zones and lowest in rapid zones across the sites. This trend was most conspicuous for taxa that build retreats on stones, such as net-spinning caddisflies, which have a sessile life form and prefer stable environments. The trend was less apparent for taxa that move freely on the bed, such as baetid and heptageniid mayflies. The macroinvertebrate community differed between the middle and peripheral areas at deep zones. Peripheral areas were dominated more by taxa that stay under stones. The channel bed topography in deep zones of riffles is likely to support high macroinvertebrate biomass by providing greater bed stability and higher water flow, the combination of which is relatively uncommon in gravel-bed rivers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available