The minimum clinically important difference for EQ-5D index: a critical review
Published 2014 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
The minimum clinically important difference for EQ-5D index: a critical review
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 221-233
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Online
2014-03-13
DOI
10.1586/14737167.2014.894462
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Can we define success criteria for lumbar disc surgery?
- (2013) Tore Solberg et al. Acta Orthopaedica
- Minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: understanding clinical versus statistical significance
- (2012) Scott L. Parker et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE
- Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
- (2012) Scott L. Parker et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE
- The early outcome of surgical treatment for femoroacetabular impingement: success depends on how you measure it
- (2012) F.M. Impellizzeri et al. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE
- Clinimetric properties of the EuroQol-5D in patients with chronic low back pain
- (2012) Remko Soer et al. Spine Journal
- Determination of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in pain, disability, and quality of life after revision fusion for symptomatic pseudoarthrosis
- (2012) Scott L. Parker et al. Spine Journal
- Responsiveness and minimal important score differences in quality-of-life questionnaires: a comparison of the EORTC QLQ-C30 cancer-specific questionnaire to the generic utility questionnaires EQ-5D and 15D in patients with multiple myeloma
- (2011) Ann Kristin Kvam et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
- A critical review of methods used to determine the smallest worthwhile effect of interventions for low back pain
- (2011) Manuela L. Ferreira et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis
- (2011) Scott L. Parker et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE
- People with low back pain typically need to feel ‘much better’ to consider intervention worthwhile: an observational study
- (2011) Manuela Loureiro Ferreira et al. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY
- Simple questionnaire for assessing core outcomes in inguinal hernia repair
- (2010) R. F. Staerkle et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY
- Using Instrument-Defined Health State Transitions to Estimate Minimally Important Differences for Four Preference-Based Health-Related Quality of Life Instruments
- (2010) Nan Luo et al. MEDICAL CARE
- A Longitudinal Comparison of 5 Preference-Weighted Health State Classification Systems in Persons with Intervertebral Disk Herniation
- (2010) Christine M. McDonough et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the EQ-5D in inflammatory bowel disease in Germany
- (2009) Renee G. Stark et al. INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES
- Hip arthroplasty patients benefit from accelerated perioperative care and rehabilitation: A quasi-experimental study of 98 patients
- (2008) Kristian Larsen et al. Acta Orthopaedica
- Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes
- (2007) Dennis Revicki et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started