General practitioners’ use of absolute risk versus individual risk factors in cardiovascular disease prevention: an experimental study
Published 2014 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
General practitioners’ use of absolute risk versus individual risk factors in cardiovascular disease prevention: an experimental study
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
BMJ Open
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages e004812
Publisher
BMJ
Online
2014-05-16
DOI
10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004812
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Agreement Among Cardiovascular Disease Risk Calculators
- (2013) G. Michael Allan et al. CIRCULATION
- The efficiency of cardiovascular risk assessment: do the right patients get statin treatment?
- (2013) Tjeerd-Pieter van Staa et al. HEART
- Polypill is not a ‘vaccine-like’ solution for primary cardiovascular disease prevention in all parts of the world
- (2013) Željko Reiner JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH
- General practitioners’ use of different cardiovascular risk assessment strategies: a qualitative study
- (2013) Carissa Bonner et al. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA
- Patient Factors Influencing the Prescribing of Lipid Lowering Drugs for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in UK General Practice: A National Retrospective Cohort Study
- (2013) Jianhua Wu et al. PLoS One
- How can clinical practice guidelines be adapted to facilitate shared decision making? A qualitative key-informant study
- (2013) Trudy van der Weijden et al. BMJ Quality & Safety
- Target cardiovascular risk rather than cholesterol concentration
- (2013) H. M. Krumholz BMJ-British Medical Journal
- A National Survey of the Treatment of Hyperlipidemia in Primary Prevention
- (2013) Michael E. Johansen et al. JAMA Internal Medicine
- Patient and Other Factors Influencing the Prescribing of Cardiovascular Prevention Therapy in the General Practice Setting With and Without Nurse Assessment
- (2012) Mohammed A. Mohammed et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- The Effect of Chance Variability in Blood Pressure Readings on the Decision Making of General Practitioners: An Internet-Based Case Vignette Study
- (2012) Mohammed A. Mohammed et al. PLoS One
- Comparisons of established risk prediction models for cardiovascular disease: systematic review
- (2012) G. C. M. Siontis et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: The Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS)
- (2011) et al. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
- Systematic Review of Guidelines on Cardiovascular Risk Assessment
- (2010) Bart S. Ferket ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Physicians’ perception, knowledge and awareness of cardiovascular risk factors and adherence to prevention guidelines: The PERCRO-DOC survey
- (2010) Željko Reiner et al. ATHEROSCLEROSIS
- Barriers to cardiovascular disease risk scoring and primary prevention in Europe
- (2010) F. D. R. Hobbs et al. QJM-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Physicians’ attitudes and adherence to use of risk scores for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: cross-sectional survey in three world regions
- (2009) Andrei C. Sposito et al. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION
- Does the routine use of global coronary heart disease risk scores translate into clinical benefits or harms? A systematic review of the literature
- (2008) Stacey L Sheridan et al. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- General Cardiovascular Risk Profile for Use in Primary Care
- (2008) Ralph B. D’Agostino et al. CIRCULATION
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreDiscover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversation