4.6 Article

Human fibroblast and stem cell resource from the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network

Journal

ALZHEIMERS RESEARCH & THERAPY
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13195-018-0400-0

Keywords

Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network; Amyloid precursor protein; Presenilin 1; Presenilin 2; Fibroblasts; Induced pluripotent stem cells

Funding

  1. Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN) [UF1 AG032438]
  2. NIH [AG046374]
  3. DIAN-TU Pharma Consortium
  4. Yulgilbar Alzheimer's Research Program
  5. DHB Foundation
  6. National Health and Medical Research Council Practitioner Fellowship
  7. Australian Research Council Future Fellowship [FT140100047]
  8. Victorian Government
  9. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [P50AG005681, K01AG046374, P01AG003991, UF1AG032438] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Mutations in amyloid precursor protein (APP), presenilin 1 (PSEN1) and presenilin 2 (PSEN2) cause autosomal dominant forms of Alzheimer disease (ADAD). More than 280 pathogenic mutations have been reported in APP, PSEN1, and PSEN2. However, understanding of the basic biological mechanisms that drive the disease are limited. The Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN) is an international observational study of APP, PSEN1, and PSEN2 mutation carriers with the goal of determining the sequence of changes in presymptomatic mutation carriers who are destined to develop Alzheimer disease. Results: We generated a library of 98 dermal fibroblast lines from 42 ADAD families enrolled in DIAN. We have reprogrammed a subset of the DIAN fibroblast lines into patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) lines. These cells were thoroughly characterized for pluripotency markers. Conclusions: This library represents a comprehensive resource that can be used for disease modeling and the development of novel therapeutics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available