4.4 Review

Location of stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer and survival rate: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

THORACIC CANCER
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages 1614-1622

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.12869

Keywords

Carcinoma, non-small-cell lung; location; lung neoplasm; pulmonary lobe; survival

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background The association between the location of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and prognosis is a debated issue. Some studies have provided evidence of better prognosis of upper lobe tumors than lower to middle lobe tumors, while other studies have reported contrasting conclusions. The aim of this study was to further assess this association through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to 27 January 2017. Patients pathologically diagnosed with stage I-III NSCLC with three or five-year survival data were included. The main meta-analysis compared differences in survival rates according to the primary tumor location using the Mantel-Haenszel method with a random effect model. Sensitivity analysis was conducted according to lymph node metastasis, tumor node metastasis stage, staging method, and treatment modality. Results Ten clinical studies and 35 570 patients were recruited. Patients with tumors in the upper lobes had a higher rate of five-year survival compared to those with tumors in non-upper lobes (odds ratio [OR] 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-1.49). Similarly, the three-year survival rate was high in patients with tumors in the upper lobes (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.02-3.86) and low in those with lower lobe tumors (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.12-0.77). Conclusions Stage I-III NSCLC located in the upper lobes showed higher five-year survival rates compared to other tumor locations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available