4.7 Article

'Everybody is moving on': Infertility, relationality and the aesthetics of family among British-Pakistani Muslims

Journal

SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
Volume 74, Issue 7, Pages 1045-1052

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.12.031

Keywords

UK; British Pakistanis; Childlessness; Family formation; Reproductive disruptions; Infertility; Islam; Ethnicity

Funding

  1. Economic and Social Research Council [RES-000-23-1488]
  2. Economic and Social Research Council [RES-000-23-1488] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. ESRC [RES-000-23-1488] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is now widely recognised that experiences of infertility are socially and culturally contingent. Drawing on reproductive narratives of 108 British-Pakistani Muslims living in Northeast England (collected from 2007 to 2010), we show that subjective experiences of infertility in this population can take many forms, from 'straightforward' childlessness to concerns about inability to fulfil a range of reproductive expectations, desires and obligations, regarding timing, gender balance and number of offspring. Extended family relations are pivotal in the processes through which reproduction (or lack thereof) becomes defined as problematic. Changing family aesthetics can thus shape individuals' experiences of infertility in important ways. A growing emphasis on conjugal relationships for some couples offers a greater range of reproductive possibilities (enabling, for example, a period of voluntary childlessness). For others, increasing nuclearisation of family life reduces the possibilities for extended families to 'plug the gap' by providing proxy-children and a normalised social role for infertile couples. Moreover, such social roles may be time-limited, creating serious challenges for the long-term childless, who find themselves caught 'betwixt and between' two disparate sets of values. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available