4.7 Article

Chiral visible light metasurface patterned in monocrystalline silicon by focused ion beam

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-29977-4

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Russian Science Foundation [18-12-00361]
  2. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation within the State assignment of FSRC Crystallography and Photonics RAS
  3. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation
  4. Russian Science Foundation [18-12-00361] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High refractive index makes silicon the optimal platform for dielectric metasurfaces capable of versatile control of light. Among various silicon modifications, its monocrystalline form has the weakest visible light absorption but requires a careful choice of the fabrication technique to avoid damage, contamination or amorphization. Presently prevailing chemical etching can shape thin silicon layers into two-dimensional patterns consisting of strips and posts with vertical walls and equal height. Here, the possibility to create silicon nanostructure of truly tree-dimensional shape by means of the focused ion beam lithography is explored, and a 300 nm thin film of monocrystalline epitaxial silicon on sapphire is patterned with a chiral nanoscale relief. It is demonstrated that exposing silicon to the ion beam causes a substantial drop of the visible transparency, which, however, is completely restored by annealing with oxidation of the damaged surface layer. As a result, the fabricated chiral metasurface combines high (50-80%) transmittance with the circular dichroism of up to 0.5 and the optical activity of up to 20 degrees in the visible range. Being also remarkably durable, it possesses crystal-grade hardness, heat resistance up to 1000 degrees C and the inertness of glass.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available