4.7 Article

Perceived stress and smoking across 41 countries: A global perspective across Europe, Africa, Asia and the Americas

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-07579-w

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research & Care Funding scheme
  2. Miguel Servet contract [CP13/00150, PI15/00862]
  3. ISCIII - General Branch Evaluation and Promotion of Health Research
  4. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF-FEDER)
  5. Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO - Vlaanderen)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Within recent years, there has been a seismic shift in smoking rates from high-income to low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). Evidence indicates that perceived stress may comprise a barrier for smoking cessation, but little is known about the association of perceived stress and smoking in LMICs. We conducted a cross-sectional, community-based study comprising 217,561 people [mean age 38.5 (SD = 16.1) years, 49.4% males]. A perceived stress score [range 2 (lowest-stress) 10 (highest-stress)] was computed from the Perceived Stress Scale. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted. In the overall sample, a one-unit increase in perceived-stress resulted in a 5% increased odds of smoking (OR = 1.05; 95% CI = 1.03-1.06). Increased stress was associated with smoking in Africa (OR = 1.06; 95% CI = 1.04-1.09), Americas (OR = 1.03; 95% CI = 1.01-1.05), and Asia (OR = 1.06; 95% CI = 1.04-1.08), but not Europe (OR = 0.99; 95% CI = 0.95-1.02). Increasing levels of perceived stress were significantly associated with heavy smoking (>= 30 cigarettes per day) among daily smokers (OR = 1.08; 95% CI = 1.02-1.15). A country-wide meta-analysis showed that perceived stress is associated with daily smoking in most countries. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm/refute this relationship, which may have meaningful public health implications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available