4.7 Article

Structure formation during translocon-unassisted co-translational membrane protein folding

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-08522-9

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Research Council, ERC [294342]
  2. Royal Society, International Exchange Award [IE50296]
  3. German Research Foundation via the collaborative research centre [CRC-1078]
  4. BBSRC [BB/N011201/1]
  5. BBSRC [BB/N011201/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/N011201/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. European Research Council (ERC) [294342] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Correctly folded membrane proteins underlie a plethora of cellular processes, but little is known about how they fold. Knowledge of folding mechanisms centres on reversible folding of chemically denatured membrane proteins. However, this cannot replicate the unidirectional elongation of the protein chain during co-translational folding in the cell, where insertion is assisted by translocase apparatus. We show that a lipid membrane (devoid of translocase components) is sufficient for successful co-translational folding of two bacterial a-helical membrane proteins, DsbB and GlpG. Folding is spontaneous, thermodynamically driven, and the yield depends on lipid composition. Time-resolving structure formation during co-translational folding revealed different secondary and tertiary structure folding pathways for GlpG and DsbB that correlated with membrane interfacial and biological transmembrane amino acid hydrophobicity scales. Attempts to refold DsbB and GlpG from chemically denatured states into lipid membranes resulted in extensive aggregation. Co-translational insertion and folding is thus spontaneous and minimises aggregation whilst maximising correct folding.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available