4.7 Article

Rapid cell separation with minimal manipulation for autologous cell therapies

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep41872

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Molecular-scale Engineering [EP/J500124/1]
  2. Wellcome Trust [WT 201058/Z/16/Z]
  3. WELMEC, a Centre of Excellence in Medical Engineering - Wellcome Trust
  4. EPSRC [WT 088908/Z/09/Z]
  5. University of Leeds internal Fellowship scheme
  6. Wellcome Trust [201058/Z/16/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  7. EPSRC [EP/I019103/1, EP/J017620/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. MRC [MC_PC_13066] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [1366180, 1229260] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ability to isolate specific, viable cell populations from mixed ensembles with minimal manipulation and within intra-operative time would provide significant advantages for autologous, cell-based therapies in regenerative medicine. Current cell-enrichment technologies are either slow, lack specificity and/or require labelling. Thus a rapid, label-free separation technology that does not affect cell functionality, viability or phenotype is highly desirable. Here, we demonstrate separation of viable from non-viable human stromal cells using remote dielectrophoresis, in which an electric field is coupled into a microfluidic channel using shear-horizontal surface acoustic waves, producing an array of virtual electrodes within the channel. This allows high-throughput dielectrophoretic cell separation in high conductivity, physiological-like fluids, overcoming the limitations of conventional dielectrophoresis. We demonstrate viable/non-viable separation efficacy of > 98% in pre-purified mesenchymal stromal cells, extracted from human dental pulp, with no adverse effects on cell viability, or on their subsequent osteogenic capabilities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available