4.7 Article

Glial pannexin1 contributes to tactile hypersensitivity in a mouse model of orofacial pain

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep38266

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National institutes of Health [AR057139]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [DFG-HA5860/1-1]
  3. Israel Science Foundation
  4. U.S.-Israel Binational Science Foundation [ISF 508/13, BSF-2011044]
  5. Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke of the National Institutes of Health [NS092466, NS092786]
  6. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health [1P30HD071593]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Drug studies in animal models have implicated pannexin1 (Panx1) in various types of pain, including trigeminal hypersensitivity, neuropathic pain and migraine. However, the tested drugs have limited specificity and efficacy so that direct evidence for Panx1 contribution to pain has been lacking. We here show that tactile hypersensitivity is markedly attenuated by deletion of Panx1 in a mouse model of chronic orofacial pain; in this model, trigeminal ganglion Panx1 expression and function are markedly enhanced. Targeted deletion of Panx1 in GFAP-positive glia or in neurons revealed distinct effects. Panx1 deletion in GFAP-positive glia cells prevented hypersensitivity completely, whereas deletion of neuronal Panx1 reduced baseline sensitivity and the duration of hypersensitivity. In trigeminal ganglia with genetically encoded Ca2+ indicator in GFAP-positive glia or in neurons, both cell populations were found to be hyperactive and hyper-responsive to ATP. These novel findings reveal unique roles for GFAP-positive glial and neuronal Panx1 and describe new chronic pain targets for cell-type specific intervention in this often intractable disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available