4.4 Article

Validation of total ozone column derived from OMPS using ground-based spectroradiometer measurements

Journal

REMOTE SENSING LETTERS
Volume 4, Issue 10, Pages 937-945

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/2150704X.2013.820004

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2010CB951603]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41001270]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The total ozone column (TOC) observations derived from the Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suit (OMPS) on-board the Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership (Suomi NPP) spacecraft were recently released for monitoring ozone in the stratosphere. Two kinds of TOC data which are derived using the NPOESS algorithm (OMPS-NPOESS) and the TOMS Version 7 algorithm (OMPS-TOMS) are provided. So far, few studies have been conducted to validate the accuracy of the OMPS TOC data. In this letter, we validate a 1 year OMPS-derived TOC data set (from March 2012 to February 2013) by comparing them with ground-based spectroradiometer data. We also examine the difference of the data derived using OMPS-NPOESS and OMPS-TOMS algorithms. Our results show a moderate correlation between OMPS-derived TOC and ground-based data, and the average relative difference between the two data sets (OMPS data minus the ground-based data) is negative, which indicates an underestimation of the TOC in the OMPS data. Such relative difference is not globally consistent: smaller values (around -10% to 0%) are found in low latitudinal areas (from 30 degrees S to 30 degrees N), whereas comparatively larger differences (around -25% to -15%) are detected in data on the mid-high latitudinal areas. A comparison of the two different algorithms suggests that the OMPS-TOMS-derived data have a generally better accuracy than those from OMPS-NPOESS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available