4.2 Article

Overview of Xanthoparmelia taxa from South Korea including the description of two new species (Parmeliaceae, Ascomycota)

Journal

PHYTOTAXA
Volume 181, Issue 2, Pages 96-109

Publisher

MAGNOLIA PRESS
DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.181.2.3

Keywords

ITS rDNA; molecular phylogeny; new species; endemic species; character distribution; pigmented medulla; volcanic rock

Categories

Funding

  1. Korean National Research Resource Center Program [NRF-2014M3A9B8002115]
  2. Korean Forest Service Program (KNA) through the Korea National Arboretum
  3. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [CGL2010-21646/BOS]
  4. Comunidad Autonoma de Madrid [REMEDINAL S-2009/AMB-1783]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the genus Xanthoparmelia, species boundaries are based on morphological and chemical features such as the presence and/or absence of secondary metabolites, diagnostic reproductive structures, isidia morphology, and color of lower surface. Two new species of Xanthoparmelia are described from South Korea, X. kolriana with cylindrical isidia containing atranorin and salazinic acid as major components in the medulla together with cortical usnic acid, while X. volcanicola is characterised by a red coloured medulla, and subglobose isidia. The characteristics of Xanthoparmelia species and their distribution in South Korea are outlined and an identification key given. Additionally, we used ITS ribosomal DNA sequences to assess the monophyly of Xanthoparmelia species from South Korea. Our results reveal that traditionally circumscribed species were not recovered as monophyletic clades. Further, we here show that ITS is insufficient to estimate a well-supported phylogenetic hypothesis, but suggests that traditional taxonomy may not reflect natural groups. This communication provides an important framework for future studies assessing species boundaries in Xanthoparmelia species in South Korea.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available