4.3 Article

Targeting the MUC1-C oncoprotein inhibits self-renewal capacity of breast cancer cells

Journal

ONCOTARGET
Volume 5, Issue 9, Pages 2622-2634

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.1848

Keywords

MUC1; breast cancer; stem-like cells; mammospheres; tumorigenicity; NF-kappa B

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health [CA97098, CA166480]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The capacity of breast cancer cells to form mammospheres in non-adherent serum-free culture is used as a functional characteristic of the self-renewing stem-like cell population. The present studies demonstrate that silencing expression of the MUC1-C oncoprotein inhibits growth of luminal MCF-7 and HER2-overexpressing SKBR3 breast cancer cells as mammospheres. We also show that triple-negative MDAMB-468 breast cancer cells are dependent on MUC1-C for growth as mammospheres and tumor xenografts. Similar results were obtained when MUC1-C function was inhibited by expression of a MUC1-C(CQC -> AQA) mutant. Moreover, treatment with the MUC1-C inhibitor GO-203, a cell penetrating peptide that binds to the MUC1-C cytoplasmic domain and blocks MUC1-C function, confirmed the importance of this target for self-renewal. The mechanistic basis for these findings is supported by the demonstration that MUC1-C activates NF-kappa B, occupies the IL-8 promoter with NF-kappa B, and induces IL-8 transcription. MUC1-C also induces NF-kappa B-dependent expression of the IL-8 receptor, CXCR1. In concert with these results, targeting MUC1-C with GO-203 suppresses IL-8/CXCR1 expression and disrupts the formation of established mammospheres. Our findings indicate that MUC1-C contributes to the self-renewal of breast cancer cells by activating the NF-kappa B -> IL-8/CXCR1 pathway and that targeting MUC1-C represents a potential approach for the treatment of this population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available