4.6 Article

Aggravated inflammation and increased expression of cysteinyl leukotriene receptors in the brain after focal cerebral ischemia in AQP4-deficient mice

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE BULLETIN
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages 680-692

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12264-012-1281-z

Keywords

aquaporin 4; gene deficiency; inflammation; cysteinyl leukotriene receptor; microglia; astrocyte; focal cerebral ischemia

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81273491, 81072618, 30772561, 30873053]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, China [Y2090069]
  3. Qianjiang Rencai Research Plan of Zhejiang Province China [2010R10055]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China [2009QNA7008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aquaporin-4 (AQP4), the main water channel protein in the brain, plays a critical role in water homeostasis and brain edema. Here, we investigated its role in the inflammatory responses after focal cerebral ischemia. In AQP4-knockout (KO) and wild-type mice, focal cerebral ischemia was induced by 30 min of middle cerebral arterial occlusion (MCAO). Ischemic neuronal injury and cellular inflammatory responses, as well as the expression and localization of cysteinyl leukotriene CysLT(2) and CysLT(1) receptors, were determined at 24 and 72 h after MCAO. AQP4-KO mice showed more neuronal loss, more severe microglial activation and neutrophil infiltration, but less astrocyte proliferation in the brain after MCAO than wild-type mice. In addition, the protein levels of both CysLT(1) and CysLT(2) receptors were up-regulated in the ischemic brain, and the up-regulation was more pronounced in AQP4-KO mice. The CysLT(1) and CysLT(2) receptors were primarily localized in neurons, microglia and neutrophils; those localized in microglia and neutrophils were enhanced in AQP4-KO mice. AQP4 may play an inhibitory role in postischemic inflammation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available