3.8 Article

Does Lunularia cruciata form symbiotic relationships with either Glomus proliferum or G-intraradices?

Journal

MYCOLOGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 112, Issue -, Pages 1063-1068

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mycres.2008.03.008

Keywords

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi; Glomus intraradices; Glomus proliferum; Lunularia cruciata; Opportunistic Partnership; Parasitic

Categories

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BSAB/ 740/2007]
  2. Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) [CRN II/14]
  3. US National Science Foundation [GEO-04523250]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BSAB/740/2007] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study was undertaken to investigate whether the behaviour in vitro of Lunularia cruciata grown with Glomus intraradices and G. proliferum, on SRV medium with 29.2 mm sucrose satisfies the requirements of Koch' postulates for mutualistic symbiosis. Hyphae emerging from mycothallus were able to grow over a two-compartment Petri dish barrier and capture and translocate phosphorus into the host liverwort. Thus, there were increases in plant dry weight, higher AM fungi spore production, and higher plant total phosphorus content. Moreover, this colonization of L. cruciata reproduces typical symptoms generally associated with mycorrhizae. These results showed that mycothalli of L. cruciata have available functionalities generally associated with mycorrhizal symbiosis in higher plants; however, the energy/photosynthetic carbon requirements to maintain a mutualistic symbiosis may be a limiting factor in vivo. Features here discussed indicate that, at least in tested experimental conditions, the endophytic association of L. cruciata with both G. intraradices and G. proliferum is a parasitic/opportunistic partnership rather than a mutualistic symbiosis. (C) 2008 The British Mycological Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available