4.6 Article

Morphological Characterization and Effective Thermal Conductivity of Dual-Scale Reticulated Porous Structures

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 7, Issue 11, Pages 7173-7195

Publisher

MDPI AG
DOI: 10.3390/ma7117173

Keywords

tomography; solar; thermochemical; conductivity; reticulated porous ceramic (RPC)

Funding

  1. Swiss Competence Center Energy Mobility
  2. Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Deutscher Forschungszentren (Virtuelles Institut SolarSyngas)
  3. European Research Council under the European Union's ERC [320541]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [320541] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reticulated porous ceramic (RPC) made of ceria are promising structures used in solar thermochemical redox cycles for splitting CO2 and H2O. They feature dual-scale porosity with mm-size pores for effective radiative heat transfer during reduction and mu m-size pores within its struts for enhanced kinetics during oxidation. In this work, the detailed 3D digital representation of the complex dual-scale RPC is obtained using synchrotron submicrometer tomography and X-ray microtomography. Total and open porosity, pore size distribution, mean pore diameter, and specific surface area are extracted from the computer tomography (CT) scans. The 3D digital geometry is then applied in direct pore level simulations (DPLS) of Fourier's law within the solid and the fluid phases for the accurate determination of the effective thermal conductivity at each porosity scale and combined, and for fluid-to-solid thermal conductivity from 10(-5) to 1. Results are compared to predictions by analytical models for structures with a wide range of porosities 0.09-0.9 in both the strut's mu m-scale and bulk's mm-scale. The morphological properties and effective thermal conductivity determined in this work serve as an input to volume-averaged models for the design and optimization of solar chemical reactors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available