4.4 Article

Mental health services utilization and expenditures associated with cancer survivorship in the United States

Journal

JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 50-58

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11764-014-0392-0

Keywords

Cancer; Mental health; Utilization; Expenditures; Prescription drug

Funding

  1. Intramural CDC HHS [CC999999] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study is to assess mental health services utilization and expenditures associated with cancer history using a nationally representative sample in the US. We used data from the 2008-2011 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey and multivariate regression models to assess mental health services use and expenditures among cancer survivors compared to individuals without a cancer history, stratified by age (18-64 and a parts per thousand yen65 years) and time since diagnosis (a parts per thousand currency sign1 vs. > 1 year). Among adults aged 18-64, compared with individuals without a cancer history, cancer survivors were more likely to screen positive for current psychological distress and depression regardless of time since diagnosis; survivors diagnosed > 1 year ago were more likely to use mental health prescription drugs; those diagnosed within 1 year reported significantly lower annual per capita mental health drug expenditure and out-of-pocket mental health expenditure, while those diagnosed > 1 year presented significantly higher annual per capita mental health expenditure. No significant differences in mental health expenditures were found among adults aged 65 or older. Mental health problems presented higher health and economic burden among younger and longer-term survivors than individuals without a cancer history. This study provides data for monitoring the impact of initiatives to enhance coverage and access for mental health services at the national level. Early detection and appropriate treatment of mental health problems may help improve quality of cancer survivorship.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available