4.1 Article

Asymmetry in sit-to-stand movement in patients following transtibial amputation and healthy individuals

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH
Volume 36, Issue 3, Pages 275-283

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e3283606235

Keywords

asymmetry; joint moments; kinematics; seat height; sit-to-stand movement; speed of sit-to-stand movement; transtibial amputation

Categories

Funding

  1. EU project CYBERLEGs [FP7-ICT-2011-7-287894]
  2. Slovenian Research Agency

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to analyse the asymmetry of sit-to-stand (STS) movement in a group of subjects following unilateral transtibial amputation (STTA) and a group of healthy subjects (HSs). Experimental measurements investigated standing-up pattern from two seat heights and at three different speeds. Body motion was measured using an optical measuring system with active markers. Floor and seat reaction forces and moments were measured by two force plates and an integrated force-moment sensor. Analysis of ankle, knee, hip and trunk inclination angles shows that STTA perform STS movement with different initial foot placement than HS, resulting in different lower extremity loadings and larger trunk inclination. Asymmetry was defined as the difference between left and right extremity parameters averaged throughout STS movement. A root-mean-square error was used to assess the asymmetry in ground reaction forces and in ankle, knee and hip angles and moments. The influence of different seat heights and velocities on asymmetry was tested using one-way ANOVA. The asymmetry of STTA and HS was affected neither in kinematic nor in kinetic parameters. Performing STS at higher speeds was found to result in decreased trunk flexion. The asymmetry assessment, as determined in this study, can be used in rehabilitation for improving STS strategies or as an evaluation tool for estimating the progress of the rehabilitation process. (c) 2013 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available