3.8 Article

Conical islands of TiO2 nanotube arrays in the photoelectrode of dye-sensitized solar cells

Journal

NANOSCALE RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages 1-10

Publisher

SPRINGEROPEN
DOI: 10.1186/s11671-015-0737-2

Keywords

Dye-sensitized solar cells; TiO2 nanotube; Conical islands; Anodic oxidation

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST)
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) through the Human Resource Training Project for Regional Innovation [2012H1B8A2026009]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012H1B8A2026009] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ti conical island structures were fabricated using photolithography and the reactive ion etching method. The resulting conical island structures were anodized in ethylene glycol solution containing 0.25 wt% NH4F and 2 vol% H2O, and conical islands composed of TiO2 nanotubes were successfully formed on the Ti foils. The conical islands composed of TiO2 nanotubes were employed in photoelectrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells (DSCs). DSC photoelectrodes based on planar Ti structures covered with TiO2 nanotubes were also fabricated as a reference. The short-circuit current (J (sc)) and efficiency of DSCs based on the conical island structures were higher than those of the reference samples. The efficiency of DSCs based on the conical island structures reached up to 1.866%. From electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and open-circuit voltage (V (oc)) decay measurements, DSCs based on the conical island structures exhibited a lower charge transfer resistance at the counter cathode and a longer electron lifetime at the interface of the photoelectrode and electrolyte compared to the reference samples. The conical island structure was very effective at improving performances of DSCs based on TiO2 nanotubes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available