4.3 Article

Long overdue improvement of box corer sampling

Journal

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
Volume 538, Issue -, Pages 13-21

Publisher

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps11405

Keywords

Box corer; Spade corer; United States Naval Electronics Laboratory; USNEL; Soft sediment sampling; Benthos; Continental margin

Funding

  1. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (project 'A pilot study to evaluate effects of possible Baltic deep water Oxygenation', BOX)
  2. Foundation BalticSea (project 'Permanent inactivation of phosphorus in Baltic sediments')

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An improved, large double-jawed box corer, intended primarily for sampling of soft sediments on continental margins and in large lakes, is described. The device performs reliably when entering the sediment and enclosing the sample, during withdrawal and hoisting on board the ship and also when detaching the collected sediment sample. It offers the following advantages: (1) robust design, (2) minimally impeded flow of water through the box chamber during lowering and (3) an efficient closure mechanism. It is furnished with a supporting stand, a transparent liner and an accessory anti-slosh baffle for insertion in the liner as the corer is set down on the ship's deck. In situ video records and turbidity measurements from field trials, as well as visual inspection of the core and supernatant water after retrieval, show that the device collects minimally disturbed sediment when properly and carefully operated. This contrasts with the bulky United States Naval Electronics Laboratory (USNEL) Spade Corer in which water flow through the box chamber during lowering is impeded, causing a bow-wave ahead of the corer that displaces surficial sediment. In addition, the USNEL's single-spade closing mechanism deforms the sediment sample severely and can even cause loss of sediment. Our new box corer performs much better, making it suitable for quantitative benthic sampling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available