4.4 Review

Sex Differences in Vulnerability to Prenatal Stress: a Review of the Recent Literature

Journal

CURRENT PSYCHIATRY REPORTS
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11920-018-0961-4

Keywords

Prenatal maternal stress; Prenatal programming; Pregnancy; Sex as a biological variable; Child health; Effect modification

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health/Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [K12 HS 022990]
  2. National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Mental Health [T32 MH 018921-25]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of Review To evaluate the degree to which recent studies provide evidence that the effects of prenatal maternal stress (PNMS) on child health outcomes vary depending on the child's biological sex. In this review, we used a broad definition of stress, including negative life events, psychological stress, and established stress biomarkers. We identified 50 peer-reviewed articles (published January 2015-December 2017) meeting the inclusion criteria. Recent Findings Most articles (k = 35) found evidence of either sex-specific associations (significant in one sex but not the other) or significant PNMS(x)stress interactions for at least one child health outcome. Evidence for sex-dependent effects was strongest in the group of studies evaluating child neural/nervous system development and temperament as outcomes. Summary There is sufficient evidence of sex-dependent associations to recommend that researchers always consider the potential role of child sex in PNMS programming studies and report descriptive statistics for study outcomes stratified by child biological sex.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available