Exploring new avenues to assess the sharp end of patient safety: an analysis of nationally aggregated peer review data
Published 2014 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Exploring new avenues to assess the sharp end of patient safety: an analysis of nationally aggregated peer review data
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
BMJ Quality & Safety
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages 1023-1030
Publisher
BMJ
Online
2014-09-27
DOI
10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003239
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Were My Diagnosis and Treatment Correct? No News is Not Necessarily Good News
- (2014) Hardeep Singh et al. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
- The frequency of diagnostic errors in outpatient care: estimations from three large observational studies involving US adult populations
- (2014) Hardeep Singh et al. BMJ Quality & Safety
- Advancing the research agenda for diagnostic error reduction
- (2013) Laura Zwaan et al. BMJ Quality & Safety
- Trends in adverse events over time: why are we not improving?
- (2013) Kaveh G Shojania et al. BMJ Quality & Safety
- Types and Origins of Diagnostic Errors in Primary Care Settings
- (2013) Hardeep Singh et al. JAMA Internal Medicine
- Assessing Individual Physician Performance
- (2012) Christine K. Cassel et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Bringing Diagnosis Into the Quality and Safety Equations
- (2012) Mark L. Graber et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Diagnostic Errors in Primary Care: Lessons Learned
- (2012) J. W. Ely et al. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
- Diagnostic errors in the intensive care unit: a systematic review of autopsy studies
- (2012) Bradford Winters et al. BMJ Quality & Safety
- Cognitive interventions to reduce diagnostic error: a narrative review
- (2012) Mark L Graber et al. BMJ Quality & Safety
- Identifying early warning signs for diagnostic errors in primary care: a qualitative study
- (2012) John Balla et al. BMJ Open
- Toward Improving Patient Safety Through Voluntary Peer-to-Peer Assessment
- (2011) Daniel W. Hudson et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY
- ‘Global Trigger Tool’ Shows That Adverse Events In Hospitals May Be Ten Times Greater Than Previously Measured
- (2011) David C. Classen et al. HEALTH AFFAIRS
- Electronic health record-based surveillance of diagnostic errors in primary care
- (2011) Hardeep Singh et al. BMJ Quality & Safety
- The Effect of Facility Complexity on Perceptions of Safety Climate in the Operating Room: Size Matters
- (2010) Brian T. Carney et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY
- Patient Record Review of the Incidence, Consequences, and Causes of Diagnostic Adverse Events
- (2010) Laura Zwaan ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Reducing Diagnostic Error Through Medical Home-Based Primary Care Reform
- (2010) Hardeep Singh et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Diagnostic error in a national incident reporting system in the UK
- (2010) Nick Sevdalis et al. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
- Common Formats Allow Uniform Collection and Reporting of Patient Safety Data by Patient Safety Organizations
- (2009) Carolyn M. Clancy AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY
- Diagnostic Error in Medicine
- (2009) Gordon D. Schiff ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- A New Strategy to Improve Quality
- (2009) Rachel M. Werner et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Diagnostic Errors—The Next Frontier for Patient Safety
- (2009) David E. Newman-Toker JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- An epistemology of patient safety research: a framework for study design and interpretation. Part 3. End points and measurement
- (2008) C Brown et al. QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started