- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
The incidence of diagnostic error in medicine
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
BMJ Quality & Safety
Volume 22, Issue Suppl 2, Pages ii21-ii27
Publisher
BMJ
Online
2013-06-16
DOI
10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001615
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Contextual Errors and Failures in Individualizing Patient Care
- (2013) Saul J. Weiner ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Types and Origins of Diagnostic Errors in Primary Care Settings
- (2013) Hardeep Singh et al. JAMA Internal Medicine
- Bringing Diagnosis Into the Quality and Safety Equations
- (2012) Mark L. Graber et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Deaths due to medical error: jumbo jets or just small propeller planes?
- (2012) Kaveh G Shojania BMJ Quality & Safety
- Preventable deaths due to problems in care in English acute hospitals: a retrospective case record review study
- (2012) Helen Hogan et al. BMJ Quality & Safety
- Diagnostic errors in the intensive care unit: a systematic review of autopsy studies
- (2012) Bradford Winters et al. BMJ Quality & Safety
- Assessment of adverse events in medical care: lack of consistency between experienced teams using the global trigger tool
- (2012) Kristina Schildmeijer et al. BMJ Quality & Safety
- Uncharted territory: measuring costs of diagnostic errors outside the medical record
- (2012) Alan Schwartz et al. BMJ Quality & Safety
- Routinely recorded patient safety events in primary care: a literature review
- (2011) C. Tsang et al. FAMILY PRACTICE
- ‘Global Trigger Tool’ Shows That Adverse Events In Hospitals May Be Ten Times Greater Than Previously Measured
- (2011) David C. Classen et al. HEALTH AFFAIRS
- Finding and fixing diagnosis errors: can triggers help?
- (2011) Gordon D Schiff BMJ Quality & Safety
- Patient Record Review of the Incidence, Consequences, and Causes of Diagnostic Adverse Events
- (2010) Laura Zwaan ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Quality in Cancer Diagnosis
- (2010) S. S. Raab et al. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS
- Why Diagnostic Errors Don’t Get Any Respect—And What Can Be Done About Them
- (2010) Robert M. Wachter HEALTH AFFAIRS
- Characteristics and Predictors of Missed Opportunities in Lung Cancer Diagnosis: An Electronic Health Record–Based Study
- (2010) Hardeep Singh et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Diagnostic error in a national incident reporting system in the UK
- (2010) Nick Sevdalis et al. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
- Errors of Diagnosis in Pediatric Practice: A Multisite Survey
- (2010) H. Singh et al. PEDIATRICS
- Missed Opportunities to Initiate Endoscopic Evaluation for Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis
- (2009) Hardeep Singh et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Timely Follow-up of Abnormal Diagnostic Imaging Test Results in an Outpatient Setting
- (2009) Hardeep Singh et al. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Diagnostic Error in Medicine
- (2009) Gordon D. Schiff ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Measuring Preventable Harm
- (2009) Peter J. Pronovost et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Taking Steps Towards a Safer Future: Measures to Promote Timely and Accurate Medical Diagnosis
- (2008) Mark L. Graber AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Minimizing Diagnostic Error: The Importance of Follow-up and Feedback
- (2008) Gordon D. Schiff AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Overconfidence as a Cause of Diagnostic Error in Medicine
- (2008) Eta S. Berner et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Diagnostic difficulty and error in primary care--a systematic review
- (2008) O. Kostopoulou et al. FAMILY PRACTICE
- Predictors of Diagnostic Accuracy and Safe Management in Difficult Diagnostic Problems in Family Medicine
- (2008) Olga Kostopoulou et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started