Assessment of the global trigger tool to measure, monitor and evaluate patient safety in cancer patients: reliability concerns are raised

Comparing Patient-Reported Hospital Adverse Events with Medical Record Review: Do Patients Know Something That Hospitals Do Not?

(2013) Joel S. Weissman et al.   ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE

Assessment of adverse events in medical care: lack of consistency between experienced teams using the global trigger tool

(2012) Kristina Schildmeijer et al.   BMJ Quality & Safety

‘Global Trigger Tool’ Shows That Adverse Events In Hospitals May Be Ten Times Greater Than Previously Measured

(2011) David C. Classen et al.   HEALTH AFFAIRS

Safety hazards in cancer care: findings using three different methods

(2011) H. Lipczak et al.   BMJ Quality & Safety

Performance Characteristics of a Methodology to Quantify Adverse Events over Time in Hospitalized Patients

(2010) Paul J. Sharek et al.   HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH

Measuring hospital adverse events: assessing inter-rater reliability and trigger performance of the Global Trigger Tool

(2010) J. M. Naessens et al.   INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE

The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes

(2010) Lidwine B. Mokkink et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Temporal Trends in Rates of Patient Harm Resulting from Medical Care

(2010) Christopher P. Landrigan et al.   NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE

A comparison of hospital adverse events identified by three widely used detection methods

(2009) J. M. Naessens et al.   INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE

Detection of adverse events in surgical patients using the Trigger Tool approach

(2008) F A Griffin et al.   QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE

Development and Evaluation of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement Global Trigger Tool

(2008) David C. Classen et al.   Journal of Patient Safety