4.1 Article

Time-Qualified Patterns of Variation of PPAR gamma, DNMT1, and DNMT3B Expression in Pancreatic Cancer Cell Lines

Journal

PPAR RESEARCH
Volume 2012, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2012/890875

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of Health through Department of Medical Sciences
  2. Research Laboratory and Division of Gastroenterology [RC1203GA58]
  3. Division of Internal Medicine and Chronobiology Unit [RC1203ME46]
  4. IRCCS Scientific Institute and Regional General Hospital

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carcinogenesis is related to the loss of homeostatic control of cellular processes regulated by transcriptional circuits and epigenetic mechanisms. Among these, the activities of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) and DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) are crucial and intertwined. PPAR gamma is a key regulator of cell fate, linking nutrient sensing to transcription processes, and its expression oscillates with circadian rhythmicity. Aim of our study was to assess the periodicity of PPAR gamma and DNMTs in pancreatic cancer (PC). We investigated the time-related patterns of PPARG, DNMT1, and DNMT3B expression monitoring their mRNA levels by qRT-PCR at different time points over a 28-hour span in BxPC-3, CFPAC-1, PANC-1, and MIAPaCa-2 PC cells after synchronization with serum shock. PPARG and DNMT1 expression in PANC-1 cells and PPARG expression in MIAPaCa-2 cells were characterized by a 24 h period oscillation, and a borderline significant rhythm was observed for the PPARG, DNMT1, and DNMT3B expression profiles in the other cell lines. The time-qualified profiles of gene expression showed different shapes and phase relationships in the PC cell lines examined. In conclusion, PPARG and DNMTs expression is characterized by different time-qualified patterns in cell lines derived from human PC, and this heterogeneity could influence cell phenotype and human disease behaviour.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available