Analysis of differences in intraocular pressure evaluation performed with contact and non-contact devices
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Analysis of differences in intraocular pressure evaluation performed with contact and non-contact devices
Authors
Keywords
Innovative technology, Scheimpflug camera, Goldmann applanation tonometry, Corvis, naïve eyes, Healthy eyes, Rebound tonometry, ORA, No contact tonometry
Journal
BMC Ophthalmology
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature America, Inc
Online
2018-09-03
DOI
10.1186/s12886-018-0900-5
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Intraocular pressure evaluation in healthy eyes and diseased ones using contact and non contact devices
- (2016) Michele Lanza et al. Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
- Comparison between Corvis and other tonometers in healthy eyes
- (2015) Michele Lanza et al. Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
- Evaluation of a novel Scheimpflug-based non-contact tonometer in healthy subjects and patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma
- (2013) Lukas Reznicek et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
- Associations Between Diurnal Changes in Goldmann Tonometry, Corneal Geometry, and Ocular Response Analyzer Parameters
- (2012) William Lau et al. CORNEA
- Comparison of Goldmann applanation and dynamic contour tonometry before and after cataract surgery
- (2012) Mitja A. Heinrich et al. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY
- Corneal Deformation Measurement Using Scheimpflug Noncontact Tonometry
- (2012) Ying Hon et al. OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE
- Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: Correlation with Intracameral Assessment of Intraocular Pressure
- (2011) Ivano Riva et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
- Adjusting Intraocular Pressure for Central Corneal Thickness Does Not Improve Prediction Models for Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma
- (2011) James D. Brandt et al. OPHTHALMOLOGY
- Effect of Oxybuprocaine Eye Drops on Corneal Volume and Thickness Measurements
- (2011) Nicola Rosa et al. OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE
- IOP Measured by Dynamic Contour Tonometry Correlates With IOP Measured by Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Non-contact Tonometry in Japanese Individuals
- (2010) Ken Ito et al. JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA
- Intraocular Pressure Measurement Precision with the Goldmann Applanation, Dynamic Contour, and Ocular Response Analyzer Tonometers
- (2010) Aachal Kotecha et al. OPHTHALMOLOGY
- Test-retest variability of intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude for dynamic contour tonometry: a multicentre study
- (2009) P. Fogagnolo et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
- Comparisons of intraocular pressure measurements: Goldmann applanation tonometry, noncontact tonometry, Tono-Pen tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry
- (2009) S-Y Hsu et al. EYE
- The influence of refractive errors on IOP measurement by rebound tonometry (ICare) and Goldmann applanation tonometry
- (2009) Teresio Avitabile et al. GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY
- Correlation of Intraocular Pressure Measured With Goldmann and Dynamic Contour Tonometry in Normal and Glaucomatous Eyes
- (2009) Tony Realini et al. JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA
- Accuracy of Goldmann, ocular response analyser, Pascal and TonoPen XL tonometry in keratoconic and normal eyes
- (2008) S P Mollan et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
- Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes
- (2008) P Ceruti et al. EYE
- Corneal Parameters and Difference Between Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Dynamic Contour Tonometry in Normal Eyes
- (2008) Michele Lanza et al. JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA
- Risk Factors for Glaucoma Onset and Progression
- (2008) Anne L. Coleman et al. SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started