4.6 Article

Tooth anatomy risk factors influencing root canal working length accessibility

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCE
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages 135-140

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.4248/IJOS11050

Keywords

root canal anatomy; root canal preparation; root canal treatment; working length

Funding

  1. State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases
  2. Department of Endodontics and Operative Dentistry, West China School of Stomatology, Sichuan University
  3. Ministry of Health of China
  4. National Key Clinical Program of China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to analyze the specific influence of root canal anatomy on the accessibility of working length during root canal therapy. Four hundred seventy-six root canal therapy cases (amounting to a total of 1 005 root canals) were examined. The anatomy risk factors assessed in each case included: tooth type (tooth location), root canal curvature, and root canal calcification, as well as endodontic retreatment. The investigation examined the correlation between each of these anatomic factors and the working length, with statistical analysis consisting of Chi-square tests and multiple logistic regression analysis. In an independent factor analysis, tooth type (tooth location), root canal curvature, canal calcification, and endodontic retreatment were determined to be the primary risk factors. In a multiple-factor regression model, root curvature and canal calcification were found to most significantly influence root canal working length accessibility (P<0.05). Root canal anatomy increases the difficulty of root canal preparation. Appropriate consideration of tooth anatomy will assist in accurate determination of preparation difficulty before instrumentation. This study alerts clinical therapists to anatomical factors influencing the working length accessibility, and allows for a direct estimate of success rate given in situ measurements of tooth factors during the root canal treatment procedure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available