Same admissions tools, different outcomes: a critical perspective on predictive validity in three undergraduate medical schools

Title
Same admissions tools, different outcomes: a critical perspective on predictive validity in three undergraduate medical schools
Authors
Keywords
Selection, Predictive validity, Admissions policy
Journal
BMC Medical Education
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2013-12-27
DOI
10.1186/1472-6920-13-173

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reprint

Contact the author

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started