4.1 Article

Towards laboratory produced relativistic electron-positron pair plasmas

Journal

HIGH ENERGY DENSITY PHYSICS
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages 225-229

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.hedp.2011.05.006

Keywords

Positron; Picosecond laser

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [DE-AC52-07NA27344]
  2. LDRD [10-ERD-044]
  3. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0807381] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We review recent experimental results on the path to producing electron-positron pair plasmas using lasers. Relativistic pair-plasmas and jets are believed to exist in many astrophysical objects and are often invoked to explain energetic phenomena related to Gamma Ray Bursts and Black Holes. On earth, positrons from radioactive isotopes or accelerators are used extensively at low energies (sub-MeV) in areas related to surface science positron emission tomography and basic antimatter science. Experimental platforms capable of producing the high-temperature pair-plasma and high-flux jets required to simulate astrophysical positron conditions have so far been absent. In the past few years, we performed extensive experiments generating positrons with intense lasers where we found that relativistic electron and positron jets are produced by irradiating a solid gold target with an intense picosecond laser pulse. The positron temperatures in directions parallel and transverse to the beam both exceeded 0.5 MeV, and the density of electrons and positrons in these jets are of order 10(16) cm(-3) and 10(13) cm(-3), respectively. With the increasing performance of high-energy ultra-short laser pulses, we expect that a high-density, up to 10(18) cm(-3), relativistic pair-plasma is achievable, a novel regime of laboratory-produced hot dense matter. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available