4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Expression of genes involved in rat liver angiogenesis after ischaemia and reperfusion: effects of ischaemic pre- and post-conditioning

Journal

HPB
Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages 554-560

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00215.x

Keywords

resection < liver; ischaemia re - perfusion < transplant

Funding

  1. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF10OC1013267] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: During surgery, ischaemic pre-(IPC) and post-conditioning (IPO) protects the liver against ischaemia/reperfusion injuries (I/R-injuries). The impact of ischaemic conditioning on liver regeneration has been less well studied. Angiogenesis is an important part of liver regeneration after hepatectomy. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of ischaemia/reperfusion and ischaemic conditioning on the expression of genes with angiogenic potential in a model of rat liver ischaemia. Methods: A model of total liver ischaemia (30 min) and reperfusion (30 min) was employed using Wistar rats. Rats were randomized into five groups: (C) control (IRI) ischaemic, IPC, IPO and IPC + IPO. Liver enzymes were sampled at the end of reperfusion. Liver biopsies were analysed using cDNA microarrays. Results: Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increased significantly in all the ischaemic groups compared with controls (P = 0.000). Searching databases 99 genes involved in rat liver angiogenesis were identified. Compared with group (C) the number of genes significantly up-regulated was as follows: IRI (n = 5), IPC (n = 24), IPO (n = 33) and IPC + IPO (n = 18). No genes were down-regulated in the four groups compared with controls. Conclusion: Ischaemic conditioning, as demonstrated in the present study, seems to be potent activators of angiogenic genes. This might be favourable to the regenerating liver.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available