4.3 Article

A novel experimental approach for fracability evaluation in tight-gas reservoirs

Journal

JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
Volume 23, Issue -, Pages 239-249

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2015.01.039

Keywords

Tight-gas reservoir; Fracability evaluation; Fracture network; Crack density; Velocity anisotropy; Stress sensitivity

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [41304141]
  2. Strategic Leading Science and Technology Project of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China [XDB10050203]
  3. Scientific Research Foundation for the Introduced Talent of China University of Petroleum (Beijing) [YJRC-2012-03, YJRC-2013-18]
  4. Science and Technology Innovation Fund Research Project of CNPC [2013D-5006-0213]
  5. China's Ministry of Science and Technology (973 program) [2015CB250900]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hydraulic fracturing is an effective stimulation method for the economic development of tight-gas reservoirs in which extremely low matrix permeability requires complex fracture networks. Petrophysical/mechanical experiments and XRD/SEM analyses demonstrate that volcanic sedimentary rock is characterized by developed natural fracture, strong brittleness, stress sensitivity, AE activity, weak anisotropy, and fluid sensitivity. Fracability index is often utilized as a key parameter to evaluate the ability to generate fracture networks. In this study, a new systematic experimental approach and a new mathematical model are established for the comprehensive evaluation of the fracability of tight-gas formations. These two methods integrate natural fracture, stress sensitivity, rock anisotropic nature, AE activity and crack density. The results indicate that the fracability index (FI) and the calculated crack density (CRD) are positively linearly correlated. The method is successfully applied to evaluate the fracability of the Yingtai gas field in northeast China. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available