4.1 Review

Testosterone, aging and survival: biomarker or deficiency

Journal

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MED.0000000000000057

Keywords

aging; androgens; biomarker; mortality; testosterone

Funding

  1. VA Research Service
  2. VA Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC)
  3. 1R01 AG042934-01
  4. AbbVie
  5. GSK Pharmaceuticals
  6. Advisory Board for Abbott
  7. Advisory Board for Endo
  8. Forendo Pharmaceuticals
  9. UpToDate.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of reviewThe purpose of this study is to review recent studies that examined the association of endogenous and exogenous testosterone and mortality in older men.Recent findingsOver the past several years, there has been a steep rise in testosterone prescriptions. The increased use of testosterone occurred in the context of several studies that reported an association between low serum testosterone and increased cardiovascular events and mortality. In contrast, recent studies have reported an association between testosterone treatment and adverse events. A testosterone treatment trial of mobility-impaired elderly men with prevalent cardiovascular disease was stopped due to increased cardiovascular events in the T-treated men and a meta-analysis reported increased cardiovascular events in T-treated men. In two recent large observational studies, testosterone treatment was associated with an increased risk for serious adverse cardiovascular events.SummaryLow testosterone is associated with mortality in multiple cohort studies; however, it is unclear if this is a causal association or due to low testosterone being a biomarker of poor health. Given recent reports of adverse outcomes associated with testosterone treatment, a conservative use of testosterone is warranted in men with cardiovascular disease who may be at greater risk for adverse outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available