4.1 Review

Biology and pharmacology of bombesin receptor subtype-3

Journal

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MED.0b013e32834ec77d

Keywords

bombesin receptor subtype-3; bombesin-like peptides; energy homeostasis; mammalian bombesin receptors; obesity; synthetic BRS-3 agonist; type 2 diabetes mellitus

Funding

  1. NIH [DK46200]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review This review summarizes the results of recent studies regarding the biology and pharmacology of novel synthetic agonists and antagonists of the bombesin receptor subtype-3 (BRS-3). Recent findings All three mammalian bombesin receptors including gastrin-releasing peptide receptor, the neuromedin B receptor, and the BRS-3 have been shown to regulate energy balance and appetite and satiety. Studies indicate that the orphan BRS-3 is an important regulator of body weight, energy expenditure, and glucose homeostasis. Endogenous bombesin-like peptides bombesin, gastrin-releasing peptide, and neuromedin B receptor do not bind to BRS-3 and the endogenous BRS-3 ligand remains unknown. The novel synthesis of selective, high-affinity BRS-3 agonists and antagonists has recently been accomplished and showed that BRS-3 regulates energy balance independent of other established pathways and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in the pancreatic islet cells. The availability of new BRS-3 selective agonists and antagonists will facilitate further elucidation of its role in energy homeostasis, and provides a potential approach for the pharmacological treatment of obesity and type 2 diabetes. Summary The native ligand of the G protein-coupled BRS-3 has not been identified as of now. However, novel synthesis of small-molecule, high-affinity agonists and antagonists on the BRS-3 was used in the recent studies and demonstrated an important role of BRS-3 in the regulation of energy homeostasis and glucose metabolism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available