4.5 Article

Staff perceptions of leadership during implementation of task-shifting in three surgical units

Journal

JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages 368-376

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2012.01401.x

Keywords

change; leadership; skill mix; task shifting; workforce

Funding

  1. Queensland Nursing Council, Australia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Registered nurses are difficult to recruit and retain. Task shifting, which involves reallocation of delegation, can reduce demand for registered nurses. Effective leadership is needed for successful task shifting. Objective This study explored leadership styles of three surgical nurse unit managers. Staff completed surveys before and after the implementation of task shifting. Task shifting involved the introduction of endorsed enrolled nurses (licensed nurses who must practise under registered nurse supervision) to better utilize registered nurses. Methods Implementation of task shifting occurred over 4months in a 700-bed tertiary hospital, in southeast Queensland, Australia. A facilitator assisted nurse unit managers during implementation. The impact was assessed by comparison of data before (n=49) and after (n=72) task shifting from registered nurses and endorsed enrolled nurses (n=121) who completed the Ward Organization Features Survey. Results Significant differences in leadership and staff organization subscales across the settings suggest that how change involving task shifting is implemented influences nurses' opinions of leadership. Conclusion Leadership behaviours of nurse unit managers is a key consideration in managing change such as task shifting. Implications for nursing management Consistent and clear messages from leaders about practice change are viewed positively by nursing staff. In the short term, incremental change possibly results in staff maintaining confidence in leadership.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available