4.7 Article

The effect of drained pre-shearing on the undrained behaviour of loose sand with a small amount of fines

Journal

ACTA GEOTECHNICA
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages 311-322

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11440-012-0195-2

Keywords

Laboratory tests; Pre-shearing; Sand with fines; Static liquefaction; Steady state; Triaxial

Funding

  1. University College Postgraduate Research Award
  2. University of New South Wales, Canberra

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stress history is recognised to play a major role in determining stress-strain behaviour of soil in undrained shearing. Most experimental studies on the effects of stress history on undrained behaviour are mainly limited to clean sand. In this paper, an experimental study carried out to investigate the effect of stress history on the undrained behaviour of loose sand with a small amount of fines is presented. Four series of triaxial compression tests, with different types of drained stress histories to near-failure prior to commencement of undrained shearing, were conducted. The experimental results indicate that drained pre-shearing to near-failure affects significantly the undrained behaviour of loose sand. In general, the drained pre-shearing improves the subsequent undrained behaviour of loose sand to the extent that liquefaction may not occur. It is shown that the effect of drained pre-shearing cannot be explained by the reduction in void ratio induced by drained pre-shearing. However, for specimens subjected to drained pre-shearing, / can be used as a parameter for analysing the effects of preloading history. It is also shown that for different preloading histories that brought the same change in void ratio or state parameter, drained pre-shearing to near-failure is the most effective, whereas pre-compression alone is the least effective in improving subsequent undrained behaviour of loose sand.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available