4.6 Article

Carbonaceous photonic crystals as ultralong cycling anodes for lithium and sodium batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 3, Issue 26, Pages 13786-13793

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5ta02873f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51271214, 51102206, 51421091]
  2. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [51025103]
  3. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-13-0993]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Via carbonization of butterfly wings, carbonaceous photonic crystals (CPCs) were derived as anode materials for lithium and sodium ion batteries (LIB and NIB) with ultralong cycling stability. Owing to the CPC's inheritance of the wing's unique photonic structure, the periodically interconnected ridges and ribs serve as perfect channels for electron transportation and allow the presence of cross-linked macropores for facile electrolyte access and ion diffusion. The carbonization-induced micro- and mesopores in the ridges and ribs can further facilitate electrolyte penetration and thus shorten the ion diffusion distances. Moreover, depending on the carbonization temperature, rich contents of O and N heteroatoms on the carbon surfaces can offer extra sites for reversible Li+/Na+ adsorption and enhance the electrochemical reactivity and electronic conductivity. For LIB/NIB applications, the derived CPC (CPC800) by carbonization at 800 degrees C delivers the best performances. CPC800 offers high specific capacities of 590 mA h g(-1) (LIB) and 235 mA h g(-1) (NIB) with similar to 100% coulombic efficiencies at 0.05 A g(-1). More impressively, CPC800 displays ultralong cycling stability for LIB and NIB applications, sustaining more than 10 000 cycles at 5 A g(-1) (LIB) and 1 A g(-1) (NIB) with no evident observation of the fading of capacity and similar to 100% coulombic efficiencies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available