4.5 Review

Conducting Systematic Reviews of Intervention Questions I: Writing the Review Protocol, Formulating the Question and Searching the Literature

Journal

ZOONOSES AND PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 61, Issue -, Pages 28-38

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/zph.12125

Keywords

Bibliographic databases; CAB Abstracts; information retrieval; literature searching; MEDLINE

Funding

  1. Laboratory for Foodborne Zoonoses, Public Health Agency of Canada
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Institute of Population and Public Health/Public Health Agency of Canada Applied Public Health Chair

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article is the fourth of six articles addressing systematic reviews in animal agriculture and veterinary medicine. Previous articles in the series have introduced systematic reviews, discussed study designs and hierarchies of evidence, and provided details on conducting randomized controlled trials, a common design for use in systematic reviews. This article describes development of a review protocol and the first two steps in a systematic review: formulating a review question, and searching the literature for relevant research. The emphasis is on systematic reviews of questions related to interventions. The review protocol is developed prior to conducting the review and specifies the plan for the conduct of the review, identifies the roles and responsibilities of the review team and provides structured definitions related to the review question. For intervention questions, the review question should be defined by the PICO components: population, intervention, comparison and outcome(s). The literature search is designed to identify all potentially relevant original research that may address the question. Search terms related to some or all of the PICO components are entered into literature databases, and searches for unpublished literature also are conducted. All steps of the literature search are documented to provide transparent reporting of the process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Article Veterinary Sciences

Future Directions for Research in Infectious Bovine Keratoconjunctivitis

Annette M. O'Connor, John A. Angelos, Elliott J. Dennis, Paola Elizalde, Mac Kneipp, John Dustin Loy, Gabriele Maier

VETERINARY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA-FOOD ANIMAL PRACTICE (2021)

Article Veterinary Sciences

Evidence Base for Treatment of Infectious Bovine Keratoconjunctivitis

Annette M. O'Connor, Mac Kneipp

Summary: Not all cattle with IBK are treated due to the self-limiting nature of the disease, but treatment is recommended as it can prevent severe outcomes. Antibiotic treatment has been found to be more effective than no treatment in healing IBK, especially in cases of bacterial infection and potential complications.

VETERINARY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA-FOOD ANIMAL PRACTICE (2021)

Article Veterinary Sciences

Component Causes of Infectious Bovine Keratoconjunctivitis The Role of Genetic Factors in the Epidemiology of Infectious Bovine Keratoconjunctivitis

Annette M. O'Connor

Summary: Breeding disease-resistant breeding stock, plants, or animals is an effective approach in agriculture. Genetically resistant animals have a permanent advantage, but caution must be taken to avoid inadvertently introducing negative traits during the development of positive traits.

VETERINARY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA-FOOD ANIMAL PRACTICE (2021)

Article Veterinary Sciences

Applying Concepts of Causal Inference to Infectious Bovine Keratoconjunctivitis

Annette M. O'Connor

VETERINARY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA-FOOD ANIMAL PRACTICE (2021)

Review Veterinary Sciences

Salmonella detection in commercially prepared livestock feed and the raw ingredients and equipment used to manufacture the feed: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Elizabeth M. Parker, Anthony J. Parker, Gwen Short, Annette M. O'Connor, Thomas E. Wittum

Summary: Salmonella contamination in livestock feed is a serious issue in veterinary and public health. A systematic review of 97 studies from 1955 to 2020 across seven global regions found differences in contamination risk between animal-based and plant-based feed components, with animal-based components being more likely to be contaminated. The prevalence of Salmonella contamination decreased over time, but antimicrobial resistance remains a concern.

PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE (2022)

Article Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Publication and accessibility of results of controlled trials in dairy science

Jan M. Sargeant, Annette M. O'Connor, Ellen R. Vriezen, Sarah C. Totton, Stephen J. LeBlanc

Summary: Research is crucial for discovering new knowledge and making evidence-based decisions, but its usefulness relies on its availability. This study examined the publication and accessibility of controlled trials conducted in dairy cattle and found that the publication and accessibility of research results in this field are suboptimal, indicating a wastage area.

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE (2022)

Article Veterinary Sciences

Levels of Evidence, Quality Assessment, and Risk of Bias: Evaluating the Internal Validity of Primary Research

Jan M. Sargeant, Marnie L. Brennan, Annette M. O'Connor

Summary: Clinical decisions should be based on the best evidence, and primary research results are an important part of that evidence. There are three approaches to evaluating internal validity: assessing bias potential based on study designs, evaluating key study design features associated with bias potential, and judging whether study design elements may result in biased results. Assessing bias risk is the least assumptive approach and should be used when possible. However, not all study designs have bias risk instruments, so it may be necessary to incorporate bias risk questions into existing quality assessment instruments.

FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE (2022)

Review Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Invited review: Maximizing value and minimizing waste in clinical trial research in dairy cattle: Selecting interventions and outcomes to build an evidence base

Jan M. Sargeant, Annette M. O'Connor, Stephen J. LeBlanc, Charlotte B. Winder

Summary: Clinical trials are valuable for evaluating intervention efficacy, but multiple trial results and intervention replication are necessary for building a body of evidence. Lack of replication and inconsistent outcomes across trials hinder the integration and interpretation of intervention efficacy. Development of core outcome sets can improve trial consistency and aid evidence-based decision-making.

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE (2022)

Review Multidisciplinary Sciences

Food insecurity among African Americans in the United States: A scoping review

Elizabeth Dennard, Elizabeth Kristjansson, Nedelina Tchangalova, Sarah Totton, Donna Winham, Annette O'Connor

Summary: This review examines the prevalence and risk factors of food insecurity among African Americans, focusing on how it is measured and the dimensions of food security it affects. The study identifies the need for more research on factors such as racial discrimination, socioeconomic status, and income insecurity, while also emphasizing the importance of synthesizing frequently studied factors like age, education, race/ethnicity, and gender through systematic reviews. Understanding the relationship between racial discrimination and food insecurity is crucial for addressing health disparities among African American adults, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic.

PLOS ONE (2022)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Connecting a disconnected trial network with a new trial: optimizing the estimation of a comparative effect in a network meta-analysis

Lauren McKeen, Paul Morris, Chong Wang, Max D. D. Morris, Annette M. M. O'Connor

Summary: This article presents an approach to finding the best connecting trial to compare the effectiveness of different treatments of interest. The study shows that connecting treatments indirectly may be preferred to direct connection by leveraging existing disconnected networks. Researchers can use the provided procedure to identify the optimal connecting trial.

BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2023)

Article Veterinary Sciences

Maximizing value and minimizing waste in clinical trial research in swine: Design features to minimize bias

Jan Sargeant, Annette O'Connor, Terri O'Sullivan, Alejandro Ramirez

Summary: Researchers should implement design features such as random allocation and blinding to reduce bias in trials. The method of generating random sequence and strategies for stratification or blocking should be reported. Objectively measured outcomes should be used when blinding is not possible. All outcomes should be reported and a publicly available trial protocol is necessary.

JOURNAL OF SWINE HEALTH AND PRODUCTION (2023)

Editorial Material Veterinary Sciences

A sounder of swine: The importance of clustering in the design, analysis, and interpretation of clinical trials

Jan M. Sargeant, Annette M. O'Connor, Terri L. O'Sullivan, Alejandro Ramirez, Chong Wang

Summary: Clustering of animals in pens, rooms, barns, or farms leads to nonindependence at the individual pig level. Failure to account for clustering results in underpowered clinical trials and inappropriate confidence intervals, potentially leading to misleading research on interventions.

JOURNAL OF SWINE HEALTH AND PRODUCTION (2023)

Article Pharmacology & Pharmacy

When we shouldn't borrow information from an existing network of trials for planning a new trial

Fangshu Ye, Chong Wang, Annette M. M. O'Connor

Summary: Researchers have proposed methods based on updating network meta-analysis to achieve higher power and increased precision in trials. However, this approach may lead to misinterpreted results and misstated conclusions. This study investigates the potential inflation of type I error risk when a new trial is conducted based on a statistically promising finding indicated by the existing network.

FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY (2023)

Article Veterinary Sciences

The standards of reporting randomized trials in pets (PetSORT): Methods and development processes

Audrey Ruple, Jan M. Sargeant, Laura E. Selmic, Annette M. O'Connor

Summary: A reporting guideline for clinical trials conducted in client- and shelter-owned dog and cat populations was developed. The guideline consists of 25 main items with several sub-items, aiming to improve the reporting quality of trials in this field. The development of the guideline was a virtual collaborative effort involving experts from different countries and sectors.

FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE (2023)

Review Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Does Vaccine-Induced Maternally-Derived Immunity Protect Swine Offspring against Influenza a Viruses? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Challenge Trials from 1990 to May 2021

Sheila Keay, Zvonimir Poljak, Famke Alberts, Annette O'Connor, Robert Friendship, Terri L. O'Sullivan, Jan M. Sargeant

Summary: This study applied evidence-based medicine methods to investigate the protection of piglets from influenza through vaccination of sows. The study found that if the vaccine used in the mother pigs matched the infecting virus, the piglets took longer to shed the virus and had lower virus titers. However, since piglets in commercial farms are often exposed to multiple strains of influenza, further research is needed to assess the real-world applicability of these findings.

ANIMALS (2023)

No Data Available