4.1 Article

Molecular Cloning of Two Structure Variants of Crustacean Hyperglycemic Hormone (CHH) from the Swimming Crab (Portunus trituberculatus), and Their Gene Expression During Molting and Ovarian Development

Journal

ZOOLOGICAL SCIENCE
Volume 31, Issue 12, Pages 802-809

Publisher

ZOOLOGICAL SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.2108/zs140053

Keywords

crustacean hyperglycemic hormone; Portunus trituberculatus; cloning; gene expression; molting; ovarian development

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [41376152, 40976098]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial National Science Foundation [LY13C190006]
  3. K.C. Wong Magna Fund at Ningbo University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two full-length cDNA (Pt-CHH1 and Pt-CHH2) sequences encoding crustacean hyperglycemic hormone (CHH) were cloned from tissues of the swimming crab (Portunus trituberculatus) using RACE. Pt-CHH1 was cloned from eyestalk, whereas Pt-CHH2 was cloned from thoracic ganglia. Sequence and structure analyses of Pt-CHH1 and Pt-CHH2 suggest that they may be generated from alternative splicing. Tissue distribution showed that transcript of Pt-CHH1 was only detected in eyestalk, while transcript of Pt-CHH2 was observed in several extra-eyestalk tissues. The transcript levels of Pt-CHH1 and Pt-CHH2 during molting and ovarian development were determined using qPCR. In molting process, level of Pt-CHH1 in eyestalk increased from stage A (postmolt), and to significant higher at stage C (intermolt), then decreased during premolt (D-0-D-4). In ovarian development, level of Pt-CHH1 in eyestalk decreased from previtellogenic stage (II), and to significant lower at mature stage (IV). The expression patterns of Pt-CHH2 in thoracic ganglia and Y-organ were distinct from that of Pt-CHH1 in eyestalk. The combined results suggest that Pt-CHH1 may be involved in inhibition of molting and ovarian development, whereas Pt-CHH2 may have other physiological functions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available