4.2 Article

Structure-based investigation of rat aldehyde oxidase inhibition by flavonoids

Journal

XENOBIOTICA
Volume 43, Issue 8, Pages 661-670

Publisher

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.3109/00498254.2012.755228

Keywords

Docking; enzyme inhibition assay; molecular modeling; quantitative structure-activity relationship

Funding

  1. Biotechnology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

1. Flavonoids are a group of polyphenolic plant metabolites most commonly known for their antioxidant activities. They also show inhibitory activities on molybdo-flavoenzymes family of enzymes which are involved in biotransformation of some exogenous and endogenous chemicals. Most notably, aldehyde oxidase (AO), a member of this family, is responsible for metabolism of some therapeutic agents. On the other hand, there are some therapeutics which inhibit AO. As flavonoids are ubiquitous in human diet and have potential to interact with AO, it is important to investigate their effects at the molecular details. 2. The inhibitory effects of 15 flavonoids on the activity of rat liver AO were assessed. Quantitative structure-activity relationship studies were performed using genetic algorithm coupled partial least square and stepwise multiple linear regression methods to elucidate the important structural properties responsible for the observed inhibitory effects. To further understand the mode of interaction between these flavonoids and AO, a homology model of the enzyme was built and flavonoids were docked into its active site. The most important amino acids involved in the interactions were identified. 3. Quercetin, myricetin and genistein were the most potent inhibitors establishing favorable interactions with the enzyme. However, the glycosylated flavonoids showed relatively weaker inhibition which may be attributed to their hindered binding into the active site of AO by bulky sugar groups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available