3.8 Article

Prealbumin is a more sensitive marker than albumin to assess the nutritional status in patients undergoing radiotherapy for head and neck cancer

Journal

WSPOLCZESNA ONKOLOGIA-CONTEMPORARY ONCOLOGY
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages 276-280

Publisher

TERMEDIA PUBLISHING HOUSE LTD
DOI: 10.5114/wo.2013.35281

Keywords

albumin; head and neck cancer; malnutrition; prealbumin; radiotherapy

Categories

Funding

  1. Erciyes University, Scientific Research Projects Fund [TST-09-664]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim of the study: The aim of this prospective study was to determine the prevalence of malnutrition and to evaluate a more sensitive marker to assess the nutritional status in patients undergoing RT for head and neck cancer. Material and methods: The prospective study included 51 (mean age of 57.6 +/- 11.2 years) patients undergoing RT for head and neck cancer. Malnutrition was defined as weight loss > 5% of baseline. Results: Forty-six (90.2%) of 51 patients were male. Malnutrition developed in 33 (64.7%) patients during RT. Mean prealbumin level was significantly lower in patients with malnutrition than in those without malnutrition (17 +/- 5 g/dl vs. 22 +/- 5 g/dl, respectively, p = 0.004). On the other hand, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of other nutrition parameters including total protein, albumin, total cholesterol, triglyceride, and glucose (p > 0.05). The percentage of weight loss negatively correlated with prealbumin (r = -0.430, p = 0.002), but not with other nutrition parameters including total protein, albumin, triglyceride, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and glucose (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The prevalence of malnutrition was high in patients with head and neck cancer. Prealbumin was a more sensitive marker than albumin to assess the nutritional status in these patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available