4.5 Review

Urological cancer care pathways: development and use in the context of systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages 291-301

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-011-0660-9

Keywords

Urological cancer; Care pathways; Systematic review; Clinical practice guidelines

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Making healthcare treatment decisions is a complex process involving a broad stakeholder base including patients, their families, health professionals, clinical practice guideline developers and funders of healthcare. This paper presents a review of a methodology for the development of urological cancer care pathways (UCAN care pathways), which reflects an appreciation of this broad stakeholder base. The methods section includes an overview of the steps in the development of the UCAN care pathways and engagement with clinical content experts and patient groups. The development process is outlined, the uses of the urological cancer care pathways discussed and the implications for clinical practice highlighted. The full set of UCAN care pathways is published in this paper. These include care pathways on localised prostate cancer, locally advanced prostate cancer, metastatic prostate cancer, hormone-resistant prostate cancer, localised renal cell cancer, advanced renal cell cancer, testicular cancer, penile cancer, muscle invasive and metastatic bladder cancer and non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. The process provides a useful framework for improving urological cancer care through evidence synthesis, research prioritisation, stakeholder involvement and international collaboration. Although the focus of this work is urological cancers, the methodology can be applied to all aspects of urology and is transferable to other clinical specialties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Article Urology & Nephrology

Cost-utility analysis of shockwave lithotripsy vs ureteroscopic stone treatment in adults

Mary M. Kilonzo, Ranan Dasgupta, Ruth Thomas, Lorna Aucott, Sara MacLennan, Thomas Boon L. Lam, Ken Anson, Sarah Cameron, Kath Starr, Neil Burgess, Francis Xavier Keeley, Charles T. Clark, James N'Dow, Graeme MacLennan, Sam McClinton

Summary: This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness and quality-adjusted life-years of treatment pathways for ureteric stones using extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) or ureteroscopic retrieval (URS). The results showed that although SWL resulted in lower QALYs, it had lower costs and was considered cost-effective at certain willingness to pay thresholds.

BJU INTERNATIONAL (2023)

Review Urology & Nephrology

Radiological features characterising indeterminate testes masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Michael Ager, Sarah Donegan, Luca Boeri, Javier Mayor de Castro, James F. Donaldson, Muhammad Imran Omar, Konstantinos Dimitropoulos, Tharu Tharakan, Florian Janisch, Tim Muilwijk, Cathy Yuan, Catrin Tudur-Smith, Rien J. M. Nijman, Christian Radmayr, Andrea Salonia, Maria P. Laguna Pes, Suks Minhas

Summary: This meta-analysis identifies radiological characteristics that have a lower odds ratio of malignancy and may be of value in the management of indeterminate testicular masses.

BJU INTERNATIONAL (2023)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Proof of concept: all-virtual guideline development workshops using GRADE during the COVID-19 pandemic

Madelin R. Siedler, M. Hassan Murad, Rebecca L. Morgan, Yngve Falck-Ytter, Reem A. Mustafa, Shahnaz Sultan, Philipp Dahm

BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (2023)

Review Pharmacology & Pharmacy

Residual Disease Threshold After Primary Surgical Treatment for Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer, Part 1: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Andrew Bryant, Eugenie Johnson, Michael Grayling, Shaun Hiu, Ahmed Elattar, Ketankumar Gajjar, Dawn Craig, Luke Vale, Raj Naik

Summary: This study is a systematic review and network meta-analysis that evaluates the impact of residual disease after primary debulking surgery in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. The results demonstrate a significant association between complete cytoreduction to no macroscopic residual disease and improved overall survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. The reliability of these results is moderate.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THERAPEUTICS (2023)

Article Ophthalmology

Effects of socioeconomic status on baseline values and outcomes at 24 months in the Treatment of Advanced Glaucoma Study randomised controlled Trial

Anthony J. King, Jemma Hudson, Augusto Azuara-Blanco, James F. Kirwan, Saurabh Goyal, Kin Sheng Lim, Graeme Maclennan

Summary: This study evaluates the impact of socioeconomic status on treatment outcomes in patients with advanced glaucoma and reports the correlation between socioeconomic status and baseline characteristics. The study found that socioeconomic status is correlated with visual function, quality of life, ethnicity, age, and number of optician visits.

BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY (2023)

Article Urology & Nephrology

Authorship diversity in global evidence synthesis in urology: 1998-2022 analysis of Cochrane reviews

Ahmad Ozair, Abhishek Kumar, Nishanth R. Subash, Sahaam Mirza, Atulya A. Khosla, Manmeet Ahluwalia, Philipp Dahm

BJU INTERNATIONAL (2023)

Article Economics

Guidance on the use of complex systems models for economic evaluations of public health interventions

Penny R. Breeze, Hazel Squires, Kate Ennis, Petra Meier, Kate Hayes, Nik Lomax, Alan Shiell, Frank Kee, Frank de Vocht, Martin O'Flaherty, Nigel Gilbert, Robin Purshouse, Stewart Robinson, Peter J. Dodd, Mark Strong, Suzy Paisley, Richard Smith, Andrew Briggs, Lion Shahab, Jo-An Occhipinti, Kenny Lawson, Thomas Bayley, Robert Smith, Jennifer Boyd, Visakan Kadirkamanathan, Richard Cookson, Monica Hernandez-Alava, Christopher H. Jackson, Amanda Karapici, Franco Sassi, Peter Scarborough, Uwe Siebert, Eric Silverman, Luke Vale, Cathal Walsh, Alan Brennan

Summary: This paper aims to assist health economic modelers in responding to the increasing demand for complex systems models in public health. It proposes identifiable features of such models and provides guidance on how to plan public health modeling projects using these models.

HEALTH ECONOMICS (2023)

Article Urology & Nephrology

GRADE Reporting in Systematic Reviews Published in the Urological Literature (2009-2021)

Brett Norling, Jae Hung Jung, Eu Chang Hwang, Mi Ah Han, Sari Khaleel, Holger J. Schunemann, Philipp Dahm

Summary: This study evaluates the reporting of the GRADE approach in systematic reviews published in the urological literature. The results indicate that only 13.0% of the 522 systematic reviews included in the study met the criteria for reporting the use of GRADE. There is a need for improved training and a reporting checklist to enhance the quality of reporting on GRADE in urological literature.

JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2023)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Conservative management versus tonsillectomy in adults with recurrent acute tonsillitis in the UK (NATTINA): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial

Janet A. Wilson, James O'Hara, Tony Fouweather, Tara Homer, Deborah D. Stocken, Luke Vale, Catherine Haighton, Nikki Rousseau, Rebecca Wilson, Lorraine Mcsweeney, Scott Wilkes, Jill Morrison, Kenneth Mackenzie, Kim Ah-See, Sean Carrie, Claire Hopkins, Nicola Howe, Musheer Hussain, Hisham Mehanna, Christopher Raine, Frank Sullivan, Alexander von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, M. Dawn Teare

Summary: This study compares the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of conservative management and tonsillectomy in adults with recurrent acute tonsillitis. The results show that immediate tonsillectomy is more effective in reducing sore throat days and has better cost-effectiveness compared to conservative management.

LANCET (2023)

Article Urology & Nephrology

Unanswered questions in prostate cancer - findings of an international multi-stakeholder consensus by the PIONEER consortium

Muhammad Imran Omar, Steven MacLennan, Maria J. Ribal, Monique J. Roobol, Konstantinos Dimitropoulos, Thomas van den Broeck, Sara J. MacLennan, Susan Evans Axelsson, Giorgio Gandaglia, Peter-Paul Willemse, Ken Mastris, John Butler Ransohoff, Zsuzsanna Devecseri, Thomas Abbott, Bertrand De Meulder, Anders Bjartell, Alex Asiimwe, James N'Dow, Emma Smith, Karin Plass, Nicolas Mottet, Robert Shepherd, Lisa Moris, Michael Lardas, Nicola Fossati, Karl Pang, Riccardo Campi, Isabella Greco, Mauro Gacci, Sergio Serni, Ragnar Lonnerbro, Alberto Briganti, Daniele Crosti, Roberto Garzonio, Martina Faticoni, Chris Bangma, Eliza Roest, Arjan Breederland, Sebastiaan Remmers, Derya Tilki, Anssi Auvinen, Teemu Murtola, Tapio Visakorpi, Kirsi Talala, Teuvo Tammela, Aino Siltari, Mieke Van Hemelrijck, Katharina Beyer, Stephane Lejeune, Laurence Colette, Simona Caputova, Delielena Poli, Sigrid van Dorp, Sophie Byrne, Luz Fialho, Ashley Rowland, Neo Tapela, Francesco Ugolini, Charles Auffray, Nesrine Taibi, Ayman Hijazy, Albert Saporta, Kai Sun, Shaun Power, Nazanin Zounemat Kermani, Kees van Bochove, Maxim Moinat, Mirella Kalafati, Azadeh Tafreshiha, Chiara Bernini, Kristina Hlavati, Denis Horgan, Louise Fullwood, Marc Holtorf, Doron Lancet, Gabi Bernstein, Sheela Tripathee, Manfred Wirth, Michael Froehner, Beate Brenner, Angelika Borkowetz, Christian Thomas, Friedemann Horn, Kristin Reiche, Markus Kreuz, Andreas Josefsson, Delila Gasi Tandefelt, Jonas Hugosson, Jack Schalken, Henkjan Huisman, Thomas Hofmarcher, Peter Lindgren, Emelie Andersson, Adam Fridhammar, Monica Tames Grijalva, Frank Verholen, Jihong Zong, Todd Williamson, Kumari Chandrawansa, Reg Waldeck, Amanda Bruno, Ronald Herrera, Ekaterina Nevedomskaya, Samuel Fatoba, Niculae Constantinovici, Ateesha Mohamed, Carl Steinbeisser, Monika Maass, Patrizia Torremante, Emmanuelle Dochy, Federica Pisa, Marc Dietrich Voss, Amit Kiran, Kishore Papineni, Jing Wang-silvanto, Robert Snijder, Xuewei Wang, Mark Lambrecht, Russ Wolfinger, Laurent Antoni, Angela Servan, Katie Pascoe, Paul Robinson, Bertrand Jaton, Daniel Bakkard, Heidi Turunen, Olavi Kilkku, Pasi Pohjanjousi, Olli Voima, Liina Nevalaita, Keijo Punakivi, Christian Reich, Sarah Seager, Shilpa Ratwani, Elaine Longden-Chapman, Danny Burke, Muriel Licour, Sarah Payne, Alan Yong, Flavia Lujan, Sophia Le Mare, Jan Hendrich, Michael Bussmann, Guido Juckeland, Daniel Kotik

Summary: In this study, an international consensus was conducted to identify the most important questions in the field of prostate cancer that could be addressed using big data. A modified Delphi survey was conducted to gather opinions from healthcare professionals and patients, aiming to understand the critical impact of answering these questions on diagnosis and treatment outcomes for prostate cancer patients.

NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY (2023)

Review Health Policy & Services

The role of Hospital-Based Cancer Registries (HBCRs) as information systems in the delivery of evidence-based integrated cancer care: a scoping review

Sheela Tripathee, Sara Jane MacLennan, Amudha Poobalan, Muhammad Imran Omar, Aravinda Meera Guntupalli

Summary: Cancer is a leading cause of death, with 10 million deaths in 2020. Hospital-Based Cancer Registries (HBCRs) that collect administrative and clinical data could improve integrated and equitable evidence-based care, but their role in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is poorly understood. This scoping review found limited evaluation of HBCRs in LMICs, with registries functioning more as data collection tools than information systems to guide cancer care priorities and policies.

HEALTH SYSTEMS (2023)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

GRADE guidance 23: considering cost-effectiveness evidence in moving from evidence to health-related recommendations

Feng Xie, Ian Shemilt, Luke Vale, Michael F. Drummond, Joanne Lord, Francis Ruiz, Kirsten H. Herrmann, Maria Ximena Rojasj, Yuan Zhang, Carlos Canelo-Aybar, Pablo Alonso-Coello, Tatyana Shamliyan, Holger J. Schueuronemanna

Summary: This article describes the integration of resource utilization and cost-effectiveness analysis into health-related recommendations using the GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks. Practical guidance is provided on estimating the cost of preventing events and creating evidence profiles and summary of findings tables based on cost-effectiveness analyses. The integration process within the GRADE's EtD frameworks is illustrated using different scenarios of available cost-effectiveness evidence.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2023)

Review Urology & Nephrology

What Are the Short-term Benefits and Potential Harms of Therapeutic Modalities for the Management of Overactive Bladder Syndrome in Women? A Review of Evidence Under the Auspices of the European Association of Urology, Female Non-neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Guidelines Panel

Fawzy Farag, Vasileios I. Sakalis, Serenella Monagas Arteaga, Neha Sihra, Markos Karavitakis, Salvador Arlandis, Kari Bo, Hanny Cobussen-Boekhorst, Elisabetta Costantini, Monica de Heide, Jan Groen, Benoit Peyronnet, Veronique Phe, Mary-Lynne van Poelgeest-Pomfret, Tine W. L. van den Bos, Huub van der Vaart, Christopher K. Harding, Marie Carmela Lapitan, Muhammad Imran Omar, Arjun K. Nambiar

Summary: Overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) is a common condition among women, and its treatment options include conservative measures, medication, and surgery. Antimuscarinics and beta-3 agonists are effective in reducing OAB symptoms, but beta-3 agonists are better at reducing nocturia episodes. Onabotulinumtoxin-A (Onabot-A) is also effective but has higher rates of adverse events. Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) shows high success rates and satisfaction, while Onabot-A injections have higher satisfaction rates but also higher rates of recurrent UTIs.

EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2023)

No Data Available