4.5 Article

Clinical Impact of MMP and TIMP Gene Polymorphisms in Gastric Cancer

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 34, Issue 12, Pages 2853-2859

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-010-0761-4

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. University of Cologne

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Recent studies suggest that single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) genes and genes of tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) have an impact on the expression of these genes and on the prognosis for gastric cancer. Methods Genomic DNA was extracted from paraffin-embedded tissues of 135 patients who were treated surgically for primary gastric carcinoma. Genotyping was performed for MMP-2(-1306C>T), TIMP-2(303C>T), and MMP-7(-181A>G). MMP-2 and TIMP-2 antigen expression in resected tumor tissues was detected immunohistochemically. Genotyping was correlated with antigen expression, histopathologic parameters, and prognosis. Results The SNPs did not correlate with tumor differentiation, pT, R category, or the classifications according to the International Union Against Cancer (UICC), the World Health Organization (WHO), and Lauren and Ming. A significant correlation was observed for TIMP-2(303C>T) with higher pN stages (p = 0.01) and more distant metastasis (p = 0.02) for patients with the CC genotypes. In univariate analysis, patients with the TIMP-2(303C>T) CC genotype had an inferior survival, that was not significant (p = 0.2). However, among the gastric cancer patients in the present study, MMP-2(-1306C>T) significantly correlated with gender, with men having more CC genotypes than women (p = 0.025). There were no significant correlations between genotype and protein levels of MMP-2 (p = 0.766) and TIMP-2 (p = 0.684). Conclusions The TIMP-2(303C>T) CC genotype is associated with higher pN and pM categories and, in contrast to previous studies, with worse survival in gastric cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available