4.6 Article

Association between serum alpha-fetoprotein levels and fatty liver disease: a cross-sectional study

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 33, Pages 11865-11870

Publisher

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i33.11865

Keywords

Fatty liver; Alpha-fetoprotein; Association; Obesity; Risk factor

Funding

  1. National Key Basic Research Development Program [2012CB524905]
  2. National Science and Technology Support Plan Project [2012BAI06B04]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81100278, 81170378, 81230012, 81270487]
  4. International Science and Technology Cooperation Projects of Zhejiang Province [2013C24010]
  5. Science Foundation of Health Bureau of Zhejiang Province [2012RCA026]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AIM: To investigate the association between serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels and fatty liver disease (FLD) in a Chinese population. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed among subjects who presented for a health examination at the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University in 2013. FLD was diagnosed based on an ultrasonography examination. Serum AFP levels were measured with a chemiluminescence immunoassay. RESULTS: Of the 9800 subjects enrolled, 2601 were diagnosed with FLD. Subjects with FLD had higher serum AFP levels than those without the disease. Subjects with high serum AFP levels had a higher prevalence of FLD, metabolic syndrome, and its components. Univariate logistic analysis showed that elevated serum AFP levels were associated with an increased risk of FLD (OR = 1.057, 95%CI: 1.031-1.084). However, after adjusting for covariates, AFP no longer remained significantly associated with the risk factors for FLD. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that serum AFP levels are significantly associated with FLD and that AFP acts as a cofactor, but not as an independent factor, for FLD. (C) 2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available