4.6 Article

Time of infliximab therapy initiation and dose escalation in Crohn's disease

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 214-218

Publisher

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i1.214

Keywords

Crohn's disease; Infliximab; Dose escalation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AIM: To determine if early initiation of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy affects the need for dose escalation. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of patients receiving infliximab therapy for Crohn's disease (CD) at two outpatient gastroenterology clinics during July 2009 to October 2010. All patients included in the study were biologic agent na ve and had moderate to severe CD (Harvey Bradshaw index > 8). Patients were divided into groups based on length of time between diagnosis to therapy initiation and concurrent immunosuppressant therapy. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to compare the time to dose escalation for the four groups. RESULTS: There were 68 patients, 51% female and 49% male, with an average age at diagnosis of 24.7 +/- 11.9 years. The average age at infliximab initiation was 34.8 +/- 14.8 years. Of the 68 patients, 19% initiated inflixiamb within 2 years of diagnosis, and 51% had concurrent immunosuppressant therapy at the time of therapy initiation. Fifty percent of patients required dose escalation and the median time from therapy initiation to dose escalation was 10 mo (interquartile range: 5.3-14.8). There was a statistically significant higher probability of requiring dose esclataion in patients who initiated biologic therapy within 2 years of diagnosis, without concurrent immunosuppressant therapy (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Those who receive infliximab within 2 years of CD diagnosis require more intense immunosuppressant therapy than those who received infliximab later. (c) 2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available