4.6 Article

Biliary phosphatidylcholine and lysophosphatidylcholine profiles in sclerosing cholangitis

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 19, Issue 33, Pages 5454-5463

Publisher

BAISHIDENG PUBL GRP CO LTD
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i33.5454

Keywords

Primary sclerosing cholangitis; Secondary sclerosing cholangitis; Cholangiocellular carcinoma; Phosphatidylcholine; Lysophosphatidylcholine; Bile; Mass spectrometry

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AIM: To analyze phospholipid profiles in intrahepatic bile from patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and secondary sclerosing cholangitis (SSC). METHODS: Intrahepatic bile specimens collected via endoscopic retrograde cholangiography from 41 patients were analyzed. Fourteen of these patients were diagnosed with PSC, 10 with SSC, 11 with choledocholithiasis or no identifiable biliary disease, and 6 with cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCC). Bile acid, cholesterol, protein, and bilirubin contents as well as pancreas lipase activity in bile were determined by biochemical methods. Phosphatidylcholine (PC) and lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) species were quantified using nano-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Bile from all the examined patient groups showed a remarkably similar PC and LPC species composition, with only minor statistical differences. Total biliary PC concentrations were highest in controls (8030 +/- 1843 mu mol/L) and lowest in patients with CCC (1969 +/- 981 mu mol/L) (P = 0.005, controls vs SSC and CCC, respectively, P < 0.05). LPC contents in bile were overall low (4.2% +/- 1.8%). Biliary LPC/PC ratios and ratios of biliary PC to bilirubin, PC to cholesterol, PC to protein, and PC to bile acids showed no intergroup differences. CONCLUSION: PC and LPC profiles being similar in patients with or without sclerosing cholangitis, these phospholipids are likely not of major pathogenetic importance in this disease group. (C) 2013 Baishideng. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available