4.2 Article

Classical biological control of Fallopia japonica in the United Kingdom - lessons for Europe

Journal

WEED RESEARCH
Volume 51, Issue 6, Pages 552-558

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3180.2011.00880.x

Keywords

biocontrol; Japanese knotweed; Aphalara itadori; Reynoutria japonica; psyllid; regulation

Funding

  1. Defra
  2. Welsh Assembly Government
  3. UK Environment Agency
  4. USDA Forest Service
  5. Network Rail
  6. Southwest Development Agency
  7. British Columbia
  8. British Waterways
  9. Cornwall Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The programme for the biological control of Fallopia japonica in the United Kingdom has provided some valuable insights into the practicalities of delivering a classical biological control programme against a weed in the European Union. In the absence of tailored legislation, the licensing process was complex but not prohibitive. It involved the production of a pest risk analysis (PRA; based on the EPPO template), an application through national legislation (the UK Wildlife and Countryside Act), the production of peer-reviewed publications, expert committee consideration, further commissioned peer review and public consultations prior to final Ministerial judgement, which was granted in March 2010. Although there is room for some streamlining in the process, this approach has proved to be effective and robust and should be applicable to similar programmes in Europe. This is important, because classical biological control has considerable potential for the management of F. japonica and other weed targets throughout Europe, especially those impacting habitats where chemical use is all but impossible. The lessons learned from the knotweed biocontrol programme are discussed, and current weed biocontrol activities in Europe are briefly summarised. A classical biocontrol programme needs to deliver more than just pure science, because effective communication and negotiations in the public and political arena can provide more challenges than the traditional scientific ones.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available