4.2 Article

Application of the WRF Hybrid ETKF-3DVAR Data Assimilation System for Hurricane Track Forecasts

Journal

WEATHER AND FORECASTING
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages 868-884

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/WAF-D-10-05058.1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of Oklahoma [122-792100]
  2. NOAA [NA08OAR4320904]
  3. NASA [NNX10AQ78G]
  4. NASA [NNX10AQ78G, 125632] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A hybrid ensemble transform Kalman filter (ETKF)-three-dimensional variational data assimilation (3DVAR) system developed for the Weather Research and Forecasting Model (WRF) was studied for the forecasts of the tracks of two major hurricanes, Ike and Gustav, in 2008 over the Gulf of Mexico. The impacts of the flow-dependent ensemble covariance generated by the ETKF were revealed by comparing the forecasts, analyses, and analysis increments generated by the hybrid data assimilation method with those generated by the 3DVAR that used the static background covariance. The root-mean-square errors of the track forecasts by the hybrid data assimilation (DA) method were smaller than those by the 3DVAR for both Ike and Gustay. Experiments showed that such improvements were due to the use of the flow-dependent covariance provided by the ETKF ensemble in the hybrid DA system. Detailed diagnostics further revealed that the increments produced by the hybrid and the 3DVAR were different for both the analyses of the hurricane itself and its environment. In particular, it was found that the hybrid, using the flow-dependent covariance that gave the hurricane-specific error covariance estimates, was able to systematically adjust the position of the hurricane during the assimilation whereas the 3DVAR was not. The study served as a pilot study to explore and understand the potential of the hybrid method for hurricane data assimilation and forecasts. Caution needs to be taken to extrapolate the results to operational forecast settings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available