4.7 Article

Scaling of cavitation erosion progression with cavitation intensity and cavitation source

Journal

WEAR
Volume 278, Issue -, Pages 53-61

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2012.01.008

Keywords

Cavitation erosion; Erosion testing; Steel; Non-ferrous metals; Erosion modeling

Funding

  1. Office of Naval Research (ONR) [N00014-08-C-0450]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A simple mathematical expression is presented to describe cavitation mean depth of erosion versus time for cavitating jets and ultrasonic cavitation. Following normalization with a characteristic time, t*, which occurs at 75% of the time of maximum rate of erosion, and a corresponding material characteristic mean erosion depth, h*, the normalized erosion depth is related to the normalized time by (h) over bar = 1 - e(-(t) over bar2) + e(-1 (t) over bar1.2). This was obtained by conducting systematic erosion progression tests on several materials and varying erosion field intensities. Both a modified ASTM-G32 method and DYNAFLOWS cavitating jets techniques were used and the jet pressures were varied between 1000 and 7000 psi. The characteristic parameters were obtained for the different configurations and the correlation was found to be very good, exceeding an R-2 of 0.988 for all cases. Relationships between these parameters and the jet pressure were obtained and resemble familiar trends presented in the literature for mass loss. The study allowed a comparative evaluation and ranking of the various materials with the two accelerated erosion testing methods used. While several materials ranked the same way with the different erosion intensities and testing method, the relative ranking of erosion resistance of some materials was seen to be dependent on the cavitation intensity. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available